“What’s the happiest you’ve ever been,” she asks.
We’re on a bench beneath a deep blue sky waiting for Old Faithful to erupt. I’m on my back on the bench, my head nestled in her lap. I look up and find a pair of black sunglasses hiding her eyes. The usual contingent of eco-jet setters mill around. Children with chocolate-smudged chins. Men wearing expedition khaki pants and LL Bean hiking boots, cameras at the ready.
My mind works backward through a litany of fond memories.
“There’s a night a little more than a year back when I lay with a girl in the back of a pickup in the high mountains of Colorado. The sky was so clear, the moon so big. There were puffy clouds marching across the sky. She looked up at the clouds and marveled at how their edges glowed all silvery. Mostly, though, it was just comfortable. I’ve never been that comfortable. There was a beautiful simplicity to it. Naked bodies beneath a pile of sleeping bags. The stars. The chill. The mountains. The silver lining.”
“The sliver lining,” she repeats. “Have you found it?”
I don’t answer. A man with a European accent shuffles by explaining to the girl on his arm something about the predictable nature of Old Faithful’s eruptions. Industrial-strength tourism in the middle of nowhere. It seems we’ve found a way to package and sell just about anything.
“OK,” she continues. “What’s the most unhappy you’ve ever been?” She slips the sunglasses down her nose, and her brown eyes glow in the sunlight.
“That one’s easier,” I say. “That would be the day I decided love doesn’t exist.”
I think that ought to elicit a response, but it doesn’t. When I look again she’s returned the glasses to the bridge of her eyes, and she’s smiling at the view. Sara’s an interesting, eclectic woman, and to say she’s adventurous would be a monumental understatement. A nurse who works in Denver, she rides a Harley and is working on a Master’s to go along with the three undergraduate degrees she’s got in biology, psychology and chemistry. She’s the only woman I’ve ever dated who I met on the Internet. The depth of my on-line ad was designed to ward off people who lack substance. And substance Sara certainly has, along with spiked blonde hair and a sexy figure. She’s as adept at talking about psychology as she is about Bible thumping—or changing a muffler.
“Are you still decided?” she eventually asks without looking.
“Still decided about what?”
“That love doesn’t exist.”
I like the way she so nonchalantly gets to the point.
“I know we’re sort of dating and all, Sara, but I suppose I’m still hung up on her. I guess I’m still waiting for her to prove whether it exists or not.”
“Maybe you’re looking in the wrong place.”
“Obviously.”
I left yesterday from the office in Sun Valley to drive across the Snake River Plain toward Jackson as Sara embarked for the same destination on a tangent from Denver. When she was pulled over in rural Wyoming she says the police officer, an apparently rough-looking fellow, had admired, simply: “nice hair.” It wasn’t enough to get her out of a speeding ticket.
The notable thing that happened during my drive was a telephone call from my mom, who shared that her father was about to die. It wasn’t a huge surprise since he’s been fighting Alzheimer’s for a solid seven years, but since he’ll be my first grandparent to pass I told her there was no way I’d not return for a funeral.
“It’s not for him. It’s for Grammy, for you, the people who are still around,” I told her. “I’ll be there. Just let me know when it happens, although I might need some help paying for a flight.”
Sara and I arrived late in Jackson, where we paid for a room and had sex. Awkward first-time sex. The problem is, I don’t really want to be intimate with anyone. It’s to move on, I guess. Something I feel like I’m supposed to do at this point.
Some people are beginning to crowd near an oval of benches positioned in a semicircle around Old Faithful, so Sara and I work our way a little closer and stand beneath the shade of a tree. Yellowstone is a fascinating place for a myriad reasons, international hoards the least among them. Created in 1872 with President Ulysses S. Grant’s signature, Yellowstone is the world’s first national park and includes 2.2 million acres of wilderness “set apart as a public park or pleasuring ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people.” And pleasure them it does. There’s ample pristine backcountry in Yellowstone, but on the beaten path it’s crowded and overused, controversy brimming in the winter in particular among snowmobilers and skiers, whose recreational pursuits are distinctly incompatible.
Old Faithful begins to burble from its mineralized cone, water splashing up in a steadily increasing stream that falls back on itself.
The literature on Old Faithful says it emits between four and eight thousand gallons of hot-spring-heated water with each eruption, and eruptions tower more than a hundred feet into the thin Wyoming air. The neat thing about geysers is that they’re all about pressure, water heating deep beneath the surface until it can escape only through narrow cracks in the earth’s plumbing. As the boiling-temperature water rises it begins to steam, which makes it expand as it nears the top of a water column. At some critical point the water is actually forced through the crack, causing a geyser to overflow, water lifted from the earth’s belly by the pressure created from steam.
It’s basic physics, but it’s wonderful to see it manifest. Old Faithful hisses into the thin mountain air for three minutes or more before subsiding in a few final fits and spasms, then vanishes.
It’s like suppressed emotion, I think. You can keep it under pressure for a while, but the longer you do, the more it’s censored, the more impressive the inevitable eruption will be.
The park too crowded to find a campsite, Sara and I drive south and discover the bumpy dirt meanders of the Ashton-Flagg Ranch Road, which threads the lodgepole-coated border between Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. We drive three miles into the wilderness, find a patch of pine needles where designated sites have been established complete with bear-proof bins, and eat hummus and crackers as the sun drifts west.
We take a short walk and find the curvy meanders of the Snake River, which begins in this corner of the West before working south past the Tetons into Jackson and then angles west into the basalt canyons of Southern Idaho.
Returned to our site, I retrieve my guitar from the truck and strum a few songs but become self-conscious about making noise in the soft twilight, a man having arrived at a nearby campsite. But as night begins to settle over northwest Wyoming he ambles over to join us and produces a bundle of burritoed blue cloth. He lays it on the table and rolls it flat to reveal sleeves containing a half-dozen wooden flutes.
That’s how the day ends: chords strummed in the key of E-minor, the merry whistle of a well-played flute and a million pointed needle holes poking through the advancing cloak of night.
© Greg Stahl
______________________________
This old story is offered here as an examination of happiness, about which questions were raised in this forum last week. The story is a curious mix of dichotomies. It includes fading romance, budding romance, impending death, the beauty of life, the freedom and tranquility offered by the natural world, and the mass-marketed appeal of mainstream thought–in this case nature appreciation, which is also offered as a metaphor for conventional ideas on the mass-marketed ideas we’re fed regarding relationships. Much of the point to this story, however, is in what is not written, and so I’ll go so far as to point a few of those things out.
It’s subtle, but the narrator is not just a little bit unhappy; he is very unhappy. I think it’s subtle because the story is set in such a magnificent place and he’s traveling with such an interesting woman, but his questions and musings help paint the picture of his inner topography. In case it’s not clear, let me be clear: he has decided that love does not exist, and that’s the foundation from which all of his observations come. It’s no mistake, either, that these characters find a secluded place to rest that’s far from Yellowstone’s hoards. This shows the narrator’s inclination to search for answers away from the mainstream’s mass-market appeal.
As this is part of a much larger story, there is a reason the narrator takes so easily to the metaphor equating pressure with emotion. He is suffering from such pressure in this story, bottling things he can’t discuss with many, but searching for avenues of release. Life eventually gives him that release, and the result is as-projected. Too much pressure built up over too much time. But the release makes way for happiness to take root again.
In this forum, though, the following Benjamin Franklin quote came up last week: “There are two ways of being happy: We must either diminish our wants or augment our means – either may do – the result is the same and it is for each man to decide for himself and to do that which happens to be easier.”
This quote implies things I cannot swallow because I view it as constructed on faulty premises. At its most simplistic level, it implies that one can acquire things to attain happiness or let go of desires to attain happiness–the dollars and cents of a very personal and spiritual quest.
In some ways, of course, it is true. If loneliness is the obstacle to happiness, then one can either diminish his or her wants (learn to be lonely) or augment his or her means (join a socially-oriented group). But that reduces the question to an overly simplistic line of logic. The truth is, loneliness is unhappy, and there’s no amount of diminishing desires for companionship that will change that.
At the same time, happiness is more than a choice. A depressed person can not simply wake up and decide to confront a new day through a happy lens. The result becomes a glossy sheen, not much more than the facade we’re sold every time we open the pages of a glamor or travel magazine. That is the selling of happiness. Modern-day capitalism packages and sells happiness with every move it makes. Depressed? Buy a pill. Blue? Go on vacation. Dejected? Buy some cologne and sleep with the woman of your dreams.
Buying into this line of thinking produces unrealistic expectations, thins savings and mounts credit card debt.
The fact is, the circumstances of one’s life can be, and often are, downright depressing. It’s a simple part of living, and it’s a perfectly fair part of living. Without valleys, mountains wouldn’t be so grand. Without winter, summer wouldn’t exist. Without sadness, there would be no happiness.
To be sure, sadness is not something to be sought, but there’s a simple beauty to honoring it. By honoring it, we uncover its root. By uncovering its root, we discover ways to fix it. When we discover ways to fix it, we are well down the path toward another mountain summit, toward another summer season, toward another happy experience.
This is not a destination; it is a process. Happiness isn’t out there; it’s in here. And while diminished wants and augmented means may be part of the structure, they are very far from its foundation.


the negative space.
nestled into the room between the positive spaces.
it all fits…
someone told me a long time ago “even slaves have moments of happiness.” i was in the process of weighing whether i should submit my life to an upheaval to journey in a more positve trend. i like to think that i can make lemons of lemonade. i was trying really hard at that point to do so. he was right when he told me this. my little moments of happiness were not enough anymore. upheaval, it was.
we may not be able to simply turn on the happy switch, but we can choose to move that direction. faith, i believe it takes. faith that if we continue to be true to ourselves and reach for our best potential in our own distinctive ways that we’ll set the stage for happiness to come naturally and comfortably, like companionship in the sleeping bags in the mountains beneath the clouds.
i agree with you. reduction of wants and needs to an equation probably won’t work – especially if what makes you happy is the examination of the shades of gray. =)
[Reply]
pardon, one more thing…
hope is every bit as critical in the finding of happiness as faith. and it’s hope, that we still have the best moments to look forward to, that love can rise like the phoenix from the ashes, and that we’ll be enough of everything that we need to be, that makes the journey so delightful.
[Reply]
Greg Stahl Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 9:40 am
I love it. You just did it so much more succinctly than I, and you simply saw it much more succinctly than I. And I think you hit the nail on the head with fewer hammer throws.
When I went home last night I continued mulling the question a bit because I don’t think I got what I was trying to get at still. You stated it, but it’s unstated in my writing above. If the most unhappy thing I’ve ever done was decide love doesn’t exist, what’s the happiest thing? Think negative space, Greg.
And I came back to faith, a word that had not yet worked its way onto my tongue. It’s been sort of subconscious throughout this four- or five- day period of mulling the question.
Happiness is like love is like hope is like god is like Quality is like… There are indications in our lives that these things exist, but at some point we’ve just got to take a leap. We’ve got to be happy, loving, hopeful, divine and exquisite.
Somewhere along the line I chose faith again. And it’s rather strong now. The plus side to the whole self-involved journey: I think I had faith before, but I’d not have admitted it. Now I know I have faith. It’s a nice switch.
Slaves are a great example, by the way. Really great. Very tangible. Thanks, Staci, for your sharp vision and efficient way with words.
[Reply]
=)
another wise friend once wrote me and said “Love — is the sum of faith, courage and hope. So I’m glad to see you’re with them all still. Or that they’re still with you.”
let me serve this back to you, friend. a self-recognition of something that was always within reach, but never really gone, can feel very much like a brand-new discovery. and i’m glad that you’re along that path now. you’ve worked hard to find it.
[Reply]
I enjoyed reading the essay you wrote in response to the many questions that evolved in regards to happiness. I think what is running through my mind is trying to figure out what this whole love thing is about after last night and doing a historical record review of my past with my ex of many years ago to try to make some sense out of something that is meant to not be logical, I fear. I feel like I fight two parts of my being; the part of me that is logical, relying on proof or data collected through experience or observation and the part tof me that believes in things that can’t be quantified. Either way, the pattern of past events does not lend to a promising future and I don’t possess the feelings I believe constitute the kind of love I want in the end…I don’t think there was ever any real love between the two of us and I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings as I have been on the receiving line of a love not recipricated, but cannot tell someone a lie in order to spare their feelings, knowing that only prolongs the obvious. I know you don’t watch a lot of movies, but the movie, “Shop Girl” by Steve Martin, based on a novella he wrote, has the main character realizing that the relationship she is in is not the relationship she thought it was and she states, “I can hurt now or hurt later. I guess I choose now.”
[Reply]
Greg Stahl Reply:
January 29th, 2010 at 11:48 am
A quote from Oriah Mountain Dreamer’s “The Invitation.”
“It doesn’t interest me if the story you are telling me is true. I want to know if you can
disappoint another to be true to yourself. If you can bear the accusation of betrayal
and not betray your own soul. If you can be faithless and therefore trustworthy.”
I quoted this, well paraphrased it, to a woman once when she was dumping me. And I believe it’s mostly true. To examine the reasons I find it untrue would probably require another essay. They have to do with nuance. “Trustworthy” can mean different things. You can learn to trust people will respond predictably to certain stimuli, and that can be positive and negative. My beef with The Invitation centers on tone, not substance, I guess.
Anyway, as I seem to have a tendency to do, I digress.
Logic versus intuition in relationships. I like your observations. In matters of the heart they’re both at work. I think a significant portion of “falling in love” relies on intuition. If it feels right it continues. A significant part of making relationships work over the long haul, or knowing when to pull the ejection handle, requires logic, which unfortunately is often a corollary to romance. We all have both skills. As with all things in life, it’s knowing when to use which one. Knowing when to use which one probably has a lot to do with self awareness. If you recognize past patterns (quantification), you’re half way down the road to breaking past patterns. If you’ve broken past patterns, you’re all the way down the road toward being able to open yourself up and using romantic intuition again. And, damn, if that’s not a lot of fun.
Back to the Steve Martin quote. The phrase “I can hurt now or hurt later. I guess I choose now” can just as easily be stated thus: “I can love now or love later. I guess I choose now.”
Ah. Words. Ideas. Do you think Plato and Aristotle were right? Is absolute truth attainable through words and ideas? Or were the Sophists right? Absolute truth evolves with the application of words and ideas?
[Reply]
Michele Kissinger Reply:
January 30th, 2010 at 5:10 pm
I like that fact that you always present me with questions that make me think. In regards to the situation I spoke of, after getting off the phone with you, my ex sent me a text stating that for “the first time in his life he had a broken heart…saying we should delete eachothers phone numbers and facebook connections.” To this I did not respond, my head already spinning as I was trying to make sense of the whole conversation and the past as it related to the present, busy applying my logic. Thinking this whole issue was coming to an end, I was wrong as the next morning on the way to the gym, I received another text stating that I needed to “wake up and walk the dogs.” Again, I chose not to respond, but that did not stop the texts which continued later that day. I have not heard anything from him since then, but am not holding my breath that will be the end of it even though I was an honest as I could be in the phone conversation without purposely being hurtful. Time will tell…I will end the subject by quoting something my ex said to me years ago, which I find interesting in retrospect: “You know why there will never be a common interest between us-because you deserve to be more than second best.”
I think the question you ask is interesting seeing as all are connected; Socrates taught Plato who taught Aristotle who taught Alexander the Great. I remember the story of “The Cave”. In “The Cave,” Plato sums up his views in an image of ignorant humanity, trapped in the depths and not even aware of its own limited perspective. The rare individual escapes the limitations of that cave and, through a long, tortuous intellectual journey, discovers a higher realm, a true reality, with a final, almost mystical awareness of Goodness as the origin of everything that exists. Such a person is then the best equipped to govern in society, having a knowledge of what is ultimately most worthwhile in life and not just a knowledge of techniques; but that person will frequently be misunderstood by those ordinary folks back in the cave who haven’t shared in the intellectual insight. If he were living today, Plato might replace his rather awkward cave metaphor with a movie theater, with the projector replacing the fire, the film replacing the objects which cast shadows, the shadows on the cave wall with the projected movie on the screen, and the echo with the loudspeakers behind the screen. The essential point is that the prisoners in the cave are not seeing reality, but only a shadowy representation of it. The importance of the allegory lies in Plato’s belief that there are invisible truths lying under the apparent surface of things which only the most enlightened can grasp; only those who seek truth through a journey forcing them to dig beneath the surface of the obvious know the shadows are but a reflection of the individuals who constitute those shadows and the echos they hear from those individuals who present in shadows are muffled, unintelligible utterances. Used to the world of illusion in the cave, the prisoners at first resist enlightenment, as students resist education…at times
But those who can achieve enlightenment deserve to be the leaders and rulers of all the rest. At the end of the passage, Plato expresses another of his favorite ideas: that education is not a process of putting knowledge into empty minds, but of making people realize that which they already know. I don’t know if that completely answered the questions posed, but as always look forward to further discussion.
I am currently snowed in…suppose to get up to a foot, but loving the time with the dogs and chance to just relax for a bit. The dogs love the snow…Have a great weekend.
[Reply]
Greg Stahl Reply:
January 31st, 2010 at 4:30 pm
Thanks for the wink on that one, Michele. And thanks for the refresher on The Allegory of the Cave. It’s one of my favorites, and now I think I’m tempted to go crack open my dusty copy of The Rhetorical Tradition, hunt the allegory down and re-read it.
As you’ve already pointed out, it’s certainly pertinent to these discussions…
I don’t know you, Greg, but I found the sadness evident in your essay. In my reading it was a real as the spikes in Sara’s hair and I don’t think sadness needs to be fixed – it’s perfect as it stands.
[Reply]